Previous,

"120% of energy filling"

I told you this line is the only one I'm afraid I have to disagree with.

In response, I received the following comments from Dr. Shibata, "Shibata the Run over."

====== from here =====

This is entirely unrelated to this column, but it is about the past column about the energy fill rate of the wave motion cannon of the Space Battleship Yamato exceeding 100%.

Defining the amount of energy when a phase transition occurs as a cut-off number seems relatively normal.

The freezing point of water is 0°C, the boiling point is 100°C, and so on.

If it were to deliver such high energy as to generate a phase transition in the state of space in the form of a focal point at a distant point, it would be necessary to fill and operate with energy more significant than the minimum reference value of 100 required for a phase transition to generate stable destruction...

I took the liberty of interpreting this like one.

====== To here =====

====== Reply from Ebata, here: =====

If you would like to present the comments I received as a paper,

A Study on the Expression of "Space Battleship Yamato Wave Motion Cannon Energy Filling 120% Problem" -- Proposal of New Filling Concept and Unit Considering Energy Phase Transition Point and Expected Energy Destination Point for New Weapons

So it is like that. In particular, the idea of the "phase transition point of energy" as 100 is an easy-to-understand indicator.

Then, it would be more realistic if there was a change in the filling rate when attacking the floating continent and when attacking the volcanic zone of the planet Gamilas.

138% for the floating continent, 115% for Gamilas, and so on.

And then Okita, Sanada, and Kodai will start arguing about this ratio -- yes, I think they will do it.

The production side will no doubt reject it, but I would like to use it at a later date as a blog post above.

====== Reply from Ebata, to here =====