2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2022-08-25 The executive branch will no longer be associated with any religious organisation that has a pending civil case or a final judgment for damages due to psychic or other commercial activities. [長年日記]

The executive branch will no longer be associated with any religious organisation that has a pending civil case or a final judgment for damages due to psychic or other commercial activities.

I think that the Cabinet should just decide the above.

Or, in the regular or extraordinary session of parliament,

Members of Parliament will no longer associate with any religious organisation that has a civil case pending against it or a final judgment for damages.

I think that all they have to do is to make a resolution like that.

It would then be sufficient if they could tell us the councillors who did not vote in favour of the proposal "by name".

-----

These would then have an impact on local authorities and on local councils.

On balance with 'freedom of religion', I think this is the only way to solve this problem without a legislative process."