2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2019-04-29 "The only thing that moved as originally planned is the correct answer, and only the person who was able to move is justice" [長年日記]

(Continuation from yesterday)

For me who only knows the names of thinkers and philosophers, there is no way how to judge true or false.

In order to refute the opponent, I must thoroughly learn about the original book of the thinker and philosopher.

But in the first place, I was not interested in such things.

Besides, from that time,

"How does a person (philosopher) who intends to improve society write a book that the public can not understand?"

I thought "I don't have to work hard to understand such a philosopher's book on such a stance,"

-----

On the other hand, the world of technology (especially engineering) is clear.

"The only thing that moved as originally planned is the correct answer, and only the person who was able to move is justice"

This is an absolute value standard.

So, no matter how well they speak technology, at least I can not trust anyone who can not move things.

Especially, a person who speak a concept only and mass-produce the power point, is out of my scope. there are many such people in the field of artificial intelligence technology.

I trust people who write 100-line executive programs with their own hands, rather than those who mass-produce 100 power points.

The voice of those who actually make things is very persuasive, and things that are made in this way are strong enough to be violent.

I look at the moving things, examine their contents, and marvel at the technological powers put into them.

-----

However, I am not a fool of the person who makes the "concept".

The "concept" is, I think that is the same as "making things", If it is so concrete and realistic that it is an immediate execution possible state.

If they show the concept in a practical state, I think that I will be obsessed and obsessed with them.

On the contrary, I don't like a person who is just a PowerPoint maker with calling "concept shop".

Unfortunately, in my life, I have never met people beyond "concept shop" (others, "standardizing shop", "business model shop", etc.).

For now, other than "making things", there is no one who has made me insane, blind and obedient.