2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2017-06-16 "It is too rude enough to blame the creator, right holder and producer( hereinafter referred to as "the creators")" [長年日記]

There seems to be many people who condemn with intense words for making popular animation and manga real live.

Of course, there are a lot in young people.

I think that many people are likely to misunderstand about this issue, I want to leave my memorandum here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1)Only the creator who make their contents, can control the contents.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Animations and novels are objects of right of intangible property, and they are privately owned properties.

Any privately owned property can be controlled by the owner(creator, right holder or producer) only. We, who just can consume the contents, have no right to complain the owner's intentions.

Of course, this right is releasable to others by money or other conditions. Because it is privately owned property. After releasing it, nobody, even if it is a creator, cannot say anything about the contents.

Anyway, we, who are not a creator, a right holder and producer, are just a poor consumers, so we cannot do anything about their control legally.

In addition, it goes without saying about the law, from the humanitarian viewpoint,

"It is too rude enough to blame the creator, right holder and producer( hereinafter referred to as "the creators")"

I think so.

Legally, the creators have not only the exercise of right of their creations , but also they can get possession of secondary creations too.(the article 27, 28 of copyright law).

Re-making them as movies or animations, are directional acts, based on the right of the creators. Any protest and blame is meaningless.

Moreover, it is a rude manner.

The creators might want to spread their world-view out in the real world, by using others content expresstions. In fact, that is is a good way to make their dream come true.

For the creator's ideal, I think

what we, just poor contents consumers, should do is to keep silent.

We would rather cooperate with the creators intentions toward new worlds, with changing the contents, depending on the new world, I believe.

(To be continued)