2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|

2016-09-16 not a "first-class" person, as a author at least. [長年日記]

I have already written the story that I hate a phrase of "xx technology that Japanese are proud of". I also have a word I hate extremely. It is

"First-class"

There are a lot of words that are used remain undefined, and I do not want to agree with the assertion that "words that can not be defined should not be used".

"First(1st) class" includes for a numbers "1".

Moreover there are "second-class" and "third-class" in the world, I think the term "first-class" should have been used as a comparable unit.

Even If so, the world should be defined quantitatively.

Of course, we do not need to be a universal definition (I think also would be impossible such a thing).

If there is a book whose title includes "first-class", the author should defined the meaning of "first-class" in the book.

The author who can not do it, is

not a "first-class" person, as a author at least.

I also falls into the logic of contradictory circulation loop.

(To be continued)