Some persons always tell us "Making sharp in my life is important". Is it true story?

Though I am a research engineer who engage in make a new idea of technology and try to realize the idea, I have no experiment to do them during working time.

Let me pick the places where I spark an idea.

The path between my home and the train station,

Ugh. I don't pick them anymore.

Come to think of it, one is the Disney Land. I don't like to get in line, so I used to write a patent description in my head.

I can tell you that I have never reached any idea in my office. The idea is coming out of the office.

-----

I like to work with taking my time, when I have time.

Concentration gets me down. I can accept that the way is non-effective, but any work will end eventually.

To begin with, I don't have enthusiastic anything I want to do.

I envy persons who enjoy baseball and soccer.

Researching copyright, pregnancy system, geek culture, they don't relate to my carrier despairingly. It is really lonely life.

So you don't have to send me threatening letter. It is absolutely meaningless.

-----

Going back to the story, "Making sharp in my life" is really good isn't it?

Who shows me the evaluation data?

If I understand the righteousness of "making sharp", I come to believe in the religion.

"Yukari! You are fast! too fast!!"

But she ignores my junior daughter's claims perfectly, and keeps reading aloud more than two hundred questions and answers lists of the science and history.

She is a voiceroid "Yuzuki Yukari"

-----

I really made a great buy.

My daughter has been built up by her, and she could learn the key Japanese chronological table by heart.

I believe that the 6th grade girl, who can response the correct answer in 2 seconds, against the following question after Yukari's voices,

- Partial Test Ban Treaty(PTBT) in 1963

- Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT) in 1968

- Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces(INF) in 1987

- Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty(CTBT) in 1996

is only my daughter.

I had been in my college life with Ramen and beef bowl.

After marriage, I was shocked to know that

"Sense of taste is easy to change by devices for eating and serving food"

It was more than "paradigm shift"

Especially "tea" is great.

Using "Kutani-Yaki" tea pod, the taste of tea becomes greater than using other pods.

In addition, drinking a "Hagi-Yaki" cup, the taste become better moreover.

-----

It is nonsense to think that the ceramic is meting in the tea,

- thermal insulation of the pod and the cup

- contacting interval between cup and mouth

- pouring speed of tea from cup to mouth

- beautiful shape that makes me feel easy

All of the above must be useful to improve the taste.

It might be possible to calculate them totally(though I don't want it.)

-----

Like the above, I think that I can understand that taste is made up from total of five senses.

On the other hand, I don't change my mind of

"a plastic leaf in a lunch box at convenience stores, annoys me."

If it is a real leaf, there seems to be antisepsis or good scent

In the case of the plastic leaf, I have to remove it from the lunch box( insanitation when using finger)

It looks like the lunch box is poor, and totally there is nothing good of it.

I want companies of convenience stores to discuss a disuse of the plastic leaf.

(Continuation from yesterday)

For example, even if assuming that a work delay of 10 minutes, the summation will more than 5000 minutes for 500 people.

The loss of working hours is going to be about 83 hours.

I think that "why do they at the support department annoy me ?"

-----

Recently, I am often asked for secretariat of various projects.

I am afraid that they are not fun, however, now I

become the age I've authority with the project members,

bluff the members corresponding to my age

have a dignity that even senior managements cannot complain directly,

have the internal HR network just for "long work life",

Well, I also think that it is inevitable.

I'm like "supervisor in the field" who manage a time schedule or progress, with working the field as a laborer.

In other words, "I" manage "myself". Of course, I try to manage anything fastest ,highly efficient, and cutting of the corner.

(To be continued)

In the field of SF, "politics by artificial intelligence" is equal to "Dystopia" now.

In the field of AI research, it seems to be stupid to say "politics by artificial intelligence". Furthermore, I personally speak, - if you can do it, show me it.

Speaking cheaply, I would like to see that "Destopia".

by the time I die.

-----

However I don't deny a possibility of "virtual politician".

I would rather be positive.

The "virtual politician" is, in short, work on the Internet, without opening their figures and names.

-----

I have already told you that, I don't care about the politician's cheating or their child's crime, at all. Because they don't commit a crime.

Of course, if they commit a crime, like evasion, bribe, or inflicting injuries. they should lose their job and be convicted.

If they can secure my private (or public) interest, I am not interested in their figures, personality and dignity at the bottom of my heart.

According to the above conditions, "politicians" is not necessary need to exit as entities.

(To be continued)

(Continuation from yesterday)

I am not concerned about the the neighbour. No, no, of course, I am desperately worried about it as a friendly nation at the bottom of my heart, what I was shocked is the fact of

"the birth rate is able to be less than "1.0"

And there is no reason that "the birth rate of Japan will be in the same condition"

-----

You might wonder "is declining birth rates so serious?". However this problem is very simple.

We know the society of increase in population well.

On the contrary,we know only the society.

And our society has been designed like that, and we don't know how to deal with the society of decrease in population.

Well, we might know it well.

For example,

declining tax revenues, declaration of bankruptcy of local authority, downslide or stop of public society service, job loss, chain reaction bankruptcy, and budget constraint of warfare....

------

In a word, we will not watch the documentary program about peoples who are brought up in poverty

but will be such people like that.

I often talk to my wife,

"The partner who marries our daughter should be someone who has lived alone every year, regardless of gender"

As specific criteria,

- Cooking is recognized as a set from "shopping" to "cleaning up"

- "Cutting", "boiling", and "baking" is possible and making a dish from the leftovers in the refrigerator

- Washing clothes using a washing machine and drying them

- If "G" appears in the room, carrying out the insecticidal treatment the same day

- Wiring and power distribution are possible, and doing simple DIY with an electric drill.

- Taking basic measures on their own against illness and injury

The reason why I adopted this standard is that I can do them.

However, this is just an outline.

I don't care about details.

-----

For example, when I can't find one of the socks that I pulled out, I put it out for washing, however my wife complains to it.

We don't have to care of it.

Because the other will be discovered eventually.

-----

"Socks that have been separated due to the mischief of fate will meet again in a cage someday."

I believe that this is a romantic story.

The two partitions I ordered from Amazon have arrived.

The larger the partition, the greater the sense of security.

How to say....

A defendant being interviewed by a lawyer at a detention center.

or

Suspect eating food during interrogation

It's a great way to kill two birds with one stone with enjoying an indescribable sense of the extraordinary.

-----

Nowadays, household infections are dancing to the top of the list of infection risks.

I don't think there will be a "mask war" as before, but please consider purchasing one.

"Why do smart cities keep failing?"

"Is data collection a bad thing in smart cities?　Why Toronto and Sidewalk Labs Failed"

"Lessons from cities where smart city plans did not go 'smart'"

There are articles with provocative titles as the above.

In my opinion, the reason is "IT".

To put it more simply, it's because "we don't know what they're doing".

-----

Naturally, those who design smart cities grasp the city from a "God's perspective," as if looking at it from air

However, smart city users do not see such design - literally "top-down design" - as such.

In this sense, we can understand what is being done in buildings, facilities, transportation, or "hakomono" such as government buildings, schools, community centers, museums, and theme parks.

In addition, those "failures" and "successes" are also clear from the user's perspective.

Above all, it is important to clarify who to blame (both individuals and corporations) in case of "failure".

-----

I believe that smart cities can be understood by users if their effects can be clearly stated.

For example.

"We'll cut our city's energy use in half, but we'll still be able to maintain our mobility services."

or

"In this city, you don't need to have your own car to get by"

It is enough if they can say it properly in the "user's language".

-----

However, the fact that the service provider for smart cities will be the "government" is troublesome.

"We will halve the number of people at City Hall, but maintain the current level of government services."

The question is, can they say the above phrase to the people at city hall themselves?

Promoting smart cities strangles the people who promote smart cities --

This is the dilemma of smart cities.

I suddenly retrieved the overall distance of the N-BOX so far from the HONDA portal site and found it to be 27,250 km.

It is roughly 3/4 of the distance around the entire circumference of the earth.

Basically, I only use the car to go back and forth between the train station or Supermarket and my home, but even so, it is still 1.5 round trips to and from Colorado, USA.

However, I believe that this kind of "totalitarian" view of things has its merits and demerits.

-----

For example,

(1) If I can improve myself by 1% every day, one year from now I will be (1+0.01)^365 = 37.8, or 38 times what I am now.

(2) I just wasted one sheet of paper a day. However, if all the people in the country implemented this, one billion sheets of paper per day would be wasted(*).

(*) This seems to be a phrase often used by students in their self-criticism during the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

(3) If Japanese TVs were unplugged, the savings in standby power alone would be enough to shut down all the power plants in Shikoku.

I think these are the equivalent.

-----

As for (1) above, I think "1%" is used to mean "small", but many of us do not have that "1%.

Edison is said, "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% effort," which is what he meant (we are mediocre).

On the other hand, considering (3) above, the "power-saving request" issued by the government now seems to be quite effective.

Aside from that.

-----

Now, the next year, 2023, will be the year that I predicted as early as 2014 that this would be the year that Japan's electricity use would begin to decline.

Due to the prior shutdown of facilities by electric power companies in conjunction with deregulation of the electric power industry and the shutdown of nuclear power plants, it is clear that there is no "electricity surplus" at this time.

However, what the actual "power usage fee" is is another matter.

After a little research, I found that there is already an article that says "Japan's electricity consumption has decreased by 12% in 10 years" -- but -- I'm not sure what it means.

In any case, next year, I will do a proper data reading and objectively summarize my predictions from 9 years ago.

Under the Political Funds Control Law, the total amount that an individual can donate to a political party is limited to 20 million yen per year. In comparison, donations made by an individual to the same political organization are limited to 1.5 million yen per year.

The problem is that 'donors who donate 50,000 yen or less in a year and payers of political fund parties of 200,000 yen or less do not have to be listed in the income and expenditure report.

In short, party tickets are truly a "delicious" system for both (1) politicians who want to avoid having their contributions listed and (2) their vested interests.

Or rather, the reality is that the law was "deliciously" designed.

If written in the style of a patent specification, it would be called "a device for producing a backing, or a method for producing a backing.

-----

However, it is also a bit harsh to assume this.

The people of our country do not want to declare their support for a political party to others, nor do they want to be exposed to the "distance" of a politician.

The 'less than \50,000 and less than \200,000' is nothing less than a buffer to that.

And it is a national trait of our country that connecting with politicians is seen as a "vice" - or rather, having witnessed the Lockheed, Sagawa Express, and Recruiting scandals in real-time, I think it is inevitable that politicians are seen as "bad people."

This is a bad loop.

-----

Breaking this loop is relatively simple: make it mandatory to list and report all donations of one yen or more.

We even clarified that 'there was a donation of 300 yen from an elementary school student's annual allowance,' and personal information is protected by the Personal Information Protection Law (where it can be anonymous).

In other words, the origin of the money remains unknown, but all information on the deposit side is disclosed down to the penny.

-----

However, the kickback problem is like a "table-flipping" to all these above considerations.

This kickback scheme destroys the Political Funding Regulation Law principle, which states that "the flow of funds for political activities should all be visible.

I understand the politicians' thirst for 'unmonitored money for free political activity.

It's not hard to understand, with the lowly examples of "bellybutton money that the husband doesn't know about" and "side income that the wife doesn't know about."

However, political activities should be related to the people's interests and not be discussed in the same paradigm as the above treatment of private interests.

-----

Members of parliament are sometimes referred to as "rule makers" and the ruling party as the "ruling party."

The people (I, as one of them) can't be helped if the rule-makers are breaking the rules.

So, why don't I "make it mandatory to list and report all donations of one yen or more"?

I feel that now is the time for the Digital Agency to move forward under the "Digitalization of Political Contributions."