When I was driving a car, I told my wife about the series topic "lunch alone".

"I was surprised to hear the senior daughter's original definition, "any group exists for avoiding "lunch alone"".

"So?"

My wife responded my comment unsurprisingly.

"No, No, No, "Making a group" is a kind of target-oriented activity, and aiming for enjoyable life of us.

"Um. Yes. I agreed with you. A group has functions you said."

I felt an unexplainable sense of discomfort from this wife comment.

"Let me check that there are two functions "lunch alone avoidance system “and "entertainment maker". I want you to tell me which a platform is"

"Needless to say, "avoidance system against "lunch alone"" is the platform."

"What on earth!?"

"I agree that it's rare case however, we could sometimes enjoy something in the group."

-----

Now for, I would like to ask you (if you were a women) whether the understanding of "group" of both my daughter and wife" is a common sense in women's field.

I have already decided that I am going to be born as a girl who is beautiful, rich, and intelligent and a student with majors in the school of humanities, next time.

Recently I have been thoughtful whether I should back down on the above issue.

(To be continued.)

Today, a new column is released, so I take a day off.

"Let's turn the world by "Number" (11) Let's explain the Kyoto Protocol using toilet and "that""

-----

This is a large work. Super large work.

Anyhow, I suggested the division from me.

And, because of the content, a member of the editorial staff seemed to be making a great fuss about this column. (I feel very sorry).

-----

The junior fellow who appeared in this column and said the following

"In conclusion, the reasons why the works you had written before has been criticized by us, are shortage of your efforts "

exists.

The other day, a colleague in seconded to affiliated companies of Singapore (I think it was), came close to my seat, I chatted with him.

A man was coming , who seemed to be his subordinates, the local employees, and we were shaking hands, and did simple self-introduction to your each other.

The colleague also introduced me as follows.

"Mr Ebata is the most famous one person in my company"

-----

Maybe, I don't think that it is compliment.

Today, new my column is released, so I take a day off.

Let's turn the world by "Number" Accident resulting in injury or death (40) "

Do not make a human death a "big taboo"

-----

For the writing of this series,

during almost all Summer and New Year (and GW) vacations and weekend holidays,

for research, data analysis and simulation,

continued to be said, "he is the lowest", "he is a psychopath", "he is a insane guy"

and exhausted, both mentally and physically now,

Such a weekend researcher

has existed.

(Continuation from yesterday)

In other words, AI technologies try to ask the complainer about the following questions,

- Why is this complainer angry?

- What is the cause of the occurrence?

- What is the intelligent level of this complainer ?

- Is there a mental illness in this complainer?

- Is there a person who has an explosive personality in this complainer's relatives?

- Has he/she made similar claims in the past?

The complainer might to be asked "Do you know the multiplication tables? "Do you know why the object falls".

If I asked such a thing, I think that "I will destroy that AI's device with a fist."

-----

The crucial difference between AI technology and humans is something about "consideration", "treating" or "reading the air".

This is a big issue that current AI technology can not overcome human being.

For the person who will say "Nevertheless, for those you have said, I think there is something to do ...", I have no more words to say.

-----

I come to think that

"PC is better than AI, because PC doesn't say something disagreeable"

Now, my opinions are opened by just my diary(blog) and serial columns.

I don't say anything by Twitter and FACEBOOK, and I don't write on any anonymous bulletin board.

With this exception, I use LINE for my family, and submit local news to the web server of block club.

I don't show my messages, however, I have read message about me or my works by several search engines, including SNS, everyday,

in order to read the impression of my works.

So,

"100% of bad reputations against me or my works are transmitted to me."

-----

"Take revenge on someone in an NOT ONLY unlikely place, BUT ANYWHERE" is one motto of mine.

If you have suffered any personal disaster after accusing Ebata (or his work), it is no doubt that it is my curse.

-----

This is not the subject of a "curse", but a story of "a bitter smile",

The other day, in the comments on Twitter, I found a phrase of

""Mr.Ebata who can not speak English, is ...."

Well, in fact, yes, there is no room for refusal. However,

""Mr. Ebata who is "loved by English "..."

will make me feel a little saved.

(Continuation from yesterday)

Anyway, we cannot know about COVID-19.

The Task Force is not analyzing the components of COVID-19, but rather reading the nature of COVID-19 from the status of infection.

As a result, "three conditions of concentrated infection" were shown.

As long as I read these three conditions, it is natural that I can read that "face masks are effective in preventing infection."

It is possible that it would be completely meaningless later in the future.

Howeve, this is a trusted information, not unsupported rumor without any ground

-----

So I don't know how they can make a fool of persons who scramble to get face masks for them or their family.

If I confirm the information of "In order to save my wife and daughters, face masks will be needed" (even if it is just rumor), I am confident that

"I will be able to kill others to get face masks"

-----

The reasons why I have not killed others yet, are

(1)I have stocks of many face mask incidentlly,

(2)I understand "three conditons of heavily contaminated" (maybe),

(3)Both my wife and I are neither chronic sufferers nor aged, now.

(4)My daughters have vitalities not to fall sick (even if infected) or to be able to recover from the sick soon.

So I have a cool nerve relatively.

Still, if we have little risk for our life, we will going to be carriers(of the virus). So we obey the administration instructions.

-----

I ask again, "Why you can look down on persons who scramble to get face masks".

I think that the person do "normal behavior", who don't know optimum solutions and have irrational belief under insufficient information.

If I watch the movie of accident or real fight at the scene, my opinion might be changed, however I can say,

I am going to be a person who cannot do optimum activities in the abnormal situation.

In stories about "another world", one of the most prominent occupations before being reincarnated into another world a "programmer".

Most of the time, this noun is preceded by "black company's".

There's a reason why "programmers" are linked to "black companies.

(1) The population of programmers is overwhelmingly small.

(2) Many people who are not programmers are the clients who order the programs.

(3) That the client essentially (hopelessly) doesn't understand what a program is.

This is because these three requirements are aligned.

-----

In addition, recently, programming languages are becoming more and more "complex" while claiming to be "simple".

There is no doubt about this.

It seems to me that program designers are relieving their frustration with existing programming languages by creating new ones.

That's fine, but it's annoying as hell for the users (developers) of the program.

-----

Of course, there are some that really aim to be "simple programming languages".

However, instead of being "simple", the functions that can be achieved are also "simple", and in addition, the performance (processing speed and resource utilization) often deteriorates.

However, I don't want to complain about a new programming language.

-----

I have been quite critical of the MEXT's programming education, but recently I have come to understand that there is another way to think about it.

I told you a little bit about it before.

"STEM Education"

seems to be able to either "critically widen the gap" in our country or, conversely, "fundamentally solve the problem of inequality.

(To be continued)

"Fogy rules the world"

I realize this phrase deeply.

-----

There is the following phrase in one of the books I read before.

All ideals , whether of the right (right-wing) or the left (left-wing), are traced to the immortal -- the state.

I remember being impressed when I was a teenager and thinking, 'I see'.

The human body does not last more than 100 years.

Therefore, they seek their dependence on the nation.

-----

Of course, "nation" here does not mean land.

They are political power, or ideology, or religion.

However, the "nation" also dies quite easily.

Any nation become easy to die, which is why studying history is such an enormous and tedious task.

-----

The death of a nation is an inevitable part of history.

However, I can understand why an old person might think, 'I don't want to see the death of a nation, only to see it end in my generation'.

And as a rule, people cannot change themselves.

It takes an enormous amount of energy to change.

It is painful to incorporate changing values into your life. It is intense pain -- I know it well.

And old people are more likely to become "power" itself than young people.

After all, they are very experienced.

And old people in power have no hesitation in changing the rules (retirement and term of office).

Thus, the power of the old person increases in a snowball-like fashion.

And old people who cannot adapt to the changing times and values become a blight on society -- "fogy".

Thus,

"Fogy rules the world"

is completed. I realize this, watching the news of the Russian military invasion of Ukraine.

-----

I reaffirm that my remaining an "old man without power" is, in itself, of great value.

Today, I am still contributing to "world peace".

I received yesterday the report that I had previously requested from "Dr. Shibata of Run Over".

I've skimmed through it, and I'm excited about it, and I'd like to jump right into the writing process immidiately -- but I'm hopelessly short on time at the moment.

I have a conference paper to write, a transfer order for the next term, and our car broke down, and to top it all off, I have to prepare for a lecture at the university

In addition, my eldest daughter has contracted corona (she is in a different residence).

It's kind of like a long version of "Oumaga-Doki".

This month's schedule is starting to fall apart noisily, and today I was delivering "sorry mail" all over the place to various people.

I was surprised to read some of the reader comments on my column.

This means that some people misinterpret the concept of the fertility rate (special fertility rate).

The birth rate needed to maintain the current population is "2.08".

This means that 2.08 people from one male-female couple (married or unmarried) in a country can give birth, i.e., 2 + α, which is equal.

Some people seem to think this is based on "1.0."

This is a terrible misunderstanding.

------

It is a big mistake to say, "Korea is at 0.72, but Japan is at 1.20.

If the birth rate that can sustain a population is expressed in a 100-point test,

South Korea: 48 points (out of 187 countries, lowest in the world)

Japan: 57 points (10th from the bottom out of 187 countries)

Incidentally,

Afghanistan: 228 points (17th from the top out of 187 countries)

Afghanistan is enrolled in the best-selected class, and we (and everyone else in Korea) are in the required remedial class.

----

Of course, a high birth rate does not mean everything is O.K. (infant mortality and other factors must be considered).

Incidentally (as you may be tired of hearing by now), the ranking of women's status in Japan is at about the same level as that of Afghanistan.

So I think it is very likely that (some) people in Afghanistan see us as, at least, we are winners against Japan.

------

At any rate, the reference value for the birth rate is not "1.0."

But "2.08".

Thank you very much for your understanding and cooperation.