I was astonished to learn in yesterday's news that the former Unification Church, formerly known as the Unification Church, is conducting 'planned production of adopted children'.

It is 'horrifying' (or 'abhorrent') to even talk about this, so please see this article.

Well, the following phrases should suffice.

=====

The handbook that provided guidelines for the life of faith also recommended a pregnancy with the intention of giving the child up for adoption, stating, "It is most desirable to make the promise of adoption before the dedicatee's pregnancy".

======

In response to this news, the former Unification Church said,

"No money was given or received in connection with the adoption"

When I heard the comment,

"Of course, you idiot. If you are giving and receiving money with this crazy adoption, you are the "real devil"!"

I shouted in front of the TV.

-----

I am overwhelmingly in favor of the use of the adoption system.

If a parent does not have the financial resources to raise a child, or if a child is at risk of being abused by an adult who is not qualified to raise the child, being cared for by an adult who meets those conditions is significant in and of itself.

More important, however, is,

"In the best interest of the child, it must be absolutely necessary"

The former Unification Church interprets this as meaning that "making a child 'for adoption purposes' for the sake of doctrine" is "especially necessary for the benefit of the child.

There is not one millimeter of "the free will of the child (or human being)" or "dignity for the child" -- there is simply "blind obedience to a doctrine that stops thinking".

Can someone please tell me what other word I can use to describe this other than 'self-righteousness'?

Above all, the sensibility to think this is "normal" is frightening from the bottom of my heart.

-----

I believe that adoption is about enduring and overcoming one's own pain and sorrow for the "sake of the child's happiness.

Therefore, it is so obvious that it is ridiculous to talk about the need to promote this system while at the same time being mindful of its operation to maximize the "happiness of the child".

They can't help but notice the bizarreness of the doctrine of 'planning for adoption when the child does not exist' -- I think this cult that creates such people is 'still scary'.

-----

Furthermore, I am not willing to forgive this organization and all of the people who support/ have supported this organization even one millimeter in the future.

And I have my own reasons for not allowing this group (I will tell you about them eventually).

Therefore, I will continue to abuse them with "the greatest 'vulgar' expression imaginable.

-----

Finally, I would like to tell 'you' to have criticized the contents of my diary with my name 'explicitly' as "vulgar".

I continue to write with a certain amount of determination (and risk) (in fact, that organization is really "dangerous").

It is natural for you to complain with my description, and I am not going to complain to you (although I am uncomfortable) -- but I am not going to stop talking about this matter (formerly known as the Unification Church).