(Continuation from yesterday)

If technology is located in a certain place (country or region) for more than 10 years, the quality of products will improve even if it is left unattended.

This is because the viewpoint of "competition" changes "quality" with "price.

"If continuing to make a thing for 20 years, the quality will improve to a level that no one can catch up anymore".This is just a common sense for our engineers.

An engineer who cannot reach to the thought, is "stupid", and should be ignored by the world.

In fact, about products on that continent that supply products all over the world, nobody said

"Wouldn't it. It is made by China"

At least, I cannot find the engineer.

However, I was really angry with, at this time

"low-powered professor" who cannot understand such a fact with neglecting the researches, and keep giving false knowledge to his/her students

The newcomer would have no sin.

I regret that I did something bad to him.

-----

An economic war is a war between nations without armed forces, and it is an effective tactic (x strategy) if used properly.

However, if we use it incorrectly, it will become "help" for "a nation with strong manufacturing ability / a nation with economic power".

In addition to the examples of "the continent" and "Japan after the war" mentioned above,

"After the First World War, a country(Third Reich) that made a tremendous economic recovery, and gained the momentum to get almost all of Europe in the next war"

There is a fact that cannot be denied.

-----

An economic war will get the maximum effect by implementing as planned, to decide the position and period before the war.

Economic wars that "raise" our opponent as a competitor are the worst.