(Continuation from yesterday)

However,

"As long as we don't accept "severe painful changes", my calculation results will be exactly as it is.'

I can affirm it.

What "severe painful changes" are,

for example, it is a future of

- Over half of Japan's population is made up of foreign migrants, Japanese becomes an old language, and English will become the official language

- children are manufactured on a machine such as an artificial uterus, and the court will grant 1000 euthanasia permits in one day

By the way, the above story, I speak seriously.

If we have the capacity to accept this change, my calculations will definitely "out". That is a pleasure.

However, the current population of Japan has been in line with my calculation results five years ago. To be honest, I'm scared.

For that reason, as long as we don't accept the "severe painful change" now, "society with a population of 1 million decreasing annually" starts automatically.

-----

If there is another thing that makes my calculation result "out of the way", it is "innovation".

An easy-to-understand example of this innovation is the "atomic bomb".

If such an unexpected thing was invented, no calculations could be made.

In fact, in the "after" world of atomic bomb, we could not use the paradigm of the "before" world, anymore.

But whether it's an "atomic bomb" or "Internet", I don't think that "innovation" is making humans happy.

"Innovation" destroys the minds of those who have made something by making steady efforts, and changes what has been hard-guarded into junk.

-----

I want neither "severe painful changes" nor "innovation".

We had to accept the changes that humanity has experienced at the 1000-year level in just 20-30 years.

To be honest, I want to say "please forgive me”.

(To be continued)