(Continuation from yesterday)

I can say the same about studying programming.

We cannot acquire a knowhow about a programming at all with just reading an instructional book.

In order to settle the knowhow, we have to transcribe a sample program on an editor of a PC, compile and build the program.

A program is not a sutram but we call it "codify" as a programming instruction method.

In addition the "settle" will be empowered by debugging, making the development environment, and retrieve trouble shooting, like annoying processes .

-----

However, there is an exceptive person in the cases.

This is a writer of the articles.

The "writer" should organize the logic of their content, and spend ages practicing in order to make a logical story.

As a result, their contents which they wrote by themselves is going to be settled in their mind.

-----

However, after all we, it is difficult for us to do actions or become a writer.

Because we have to live our life and don't have enough time to do them.

So I have done

"to make a abstract of the article by myself".

I think that this is a sort of "codify".

In addition,

"I have opened the abstract on the Internet, if it is not bad one."

With the tension that my works are read by others, I can concentrate to "codify" deeply.

Even if they are also difficult for you,

"Trying to explain a content of the article you read to others"

might be good.

The "settle" may work well to explain your thought to others.

(In my case, I will settle it by talking to my wife")

In our engineering field, there is a saying

"You can say "I understand" when you can explain to others"

This is really a "mot", I think.

------

I think that why the lessons from "Leaders of manga", "Life lessons told by the main character of animation" could not be settled, is

"difficult to apply our life to use cases"

For me, I don't have

- an intention to govern the continent,

- an intention of training to go to space,

- an intention to aim at world champion

at all.