(Continuation from yesterday)

After the play, I exchanged impressions with my family. When I said

Ebata:"Hiroin's character was overstressed"

However, my wife and daughter claimed strongly that

"No way. I would be rather "weak". It was a restrained play"

"The bulky two-volume work has been packed in the two hours playing"

They praised the scenario of playing.

As I recall, I remember that I had same impression about "Golden Slumber" two years back.

-----

How to enjoy "secondary works" is case-by-case. "read it before" is good for someone, or "read it after" is good for others

Bursting into the talk about animation, in this quarter, I have not read the original work of "Miss Kaguya the love war" and "promised never-land" I wrote before.

Especially, "promised never-land" was an amazing master-piece animation I have never seen (Congratulations for the second season)

On the other hand, some readers seem to complain the animation of "promised never-land".

However, since I have not read them at all, I could enjoy the animation with unspeakable impressions.

-----

Whichever it is "read it before" or "read it after", both an original work and a secondary work are full-fledged works(However, there is a relation between master and servant of copyright)。

Whether it is an animation or an live-action, each of work has many people's efforts and times speculatively.

Needless to say there is no problem to criticize the works.

However, for a person who agitates for anti-live action about "second works" (especially in animation → live-action), which have not been completed yet,

I give up my effort to know that person, and I have decided to just say to them

"Idiot"