In the world, there is a person who writes consultation on the bulletin board of the Internet.

Those who do consultation on the Internet, I think there are two objectives.

(1)to ask the solution.

(2)to ask a sympathy

So, in response to such consultations on the Internet, a free ... (Correction) kind person, is likely to behave as follows.

(A) to give the solution

(B) to sympathize

(C) to preach to the questioner

I think that you understand, the above (1) - (A), (2) - (B) are paired, but (C) does not answer the question of the questioner. Moreover they also seem to be contempting the questioner.

Maybe they seem to believe that

"My words are worthy"

In the world, there are a lot of free people, and believe their way, on the Internet.

In a conclusion, this closed loop is completed, that the questioner can hurt their heart by the words of the free persons.

-----

The first thing to note is that the person who "(C) preaches to the questioner" has a lot of free time.

I naturally "leave".

To begin with, I do not have the energy to seriously consult such an anonymous person, and I also think that writing time is "a mottainai".

However, there are really many people who "(C) preach to the questioner" like this.

The reason is clear. In the end, such sermons are very "fun".

For human beings who are exhausted or who are weak in their position, It is the best entertainment to preach on an ego trip.

I can understand that feeling, but I have decided not to enter the bulletin board for consultation.((Actually I did it only once, and I regreted it."))

(To be continued)