2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|

2014-12-16 "You can speak English in thirty minutes", [長年日記]

In the trademark law, the administrator can reject a registration of mark, which makes the quality of good misidentify.

Without the registration, there are rules that make us prohibit using such a description. (Unfair Competition Prevention Law).

The purpose of these rules is that prohibiting such marks and descriptions leads to the consumer protection.

For example, "medicine that recovers from cold in three hours", without the effectiveness.

-----

I sometimes think that according to "diet books" "diet appliance", I wonder that there are no trials for not being the effect.

In addition, I think that the English teaching materials "to become fluent in English in three months" is also same.

In spite of ineffective, it does such a notation.

-----

But

About the book whose title is "You can speak English in thirty minutes"

I think it becomes dismissal with prejudice on the merits and/or a judgment of not guilty, even if you file a lawsuit.

Why?

(To be continued)